Compare MicroOrm.Dapper.Repositories and Dapper.FastCRUD's popularity and activity
Popularity
6.0
Growing
Activity
0.0
-
Popularity
5.2
Growing
Activity
0.0
Declining
MicroOrm.Dapper.Repositories | Dapper.FastCRUD | |
604 | 468 | |
56 | 32 | |
200 | 128 | |
82 days | 134 days | |
about 3 years ago | almost 7 years ago | |
7 days ago | 26 days ago | |
L4 | L3 | |
C# | C# | |
MIT License | MIT License | |
Repository, ORM, SQL, Micro-orm, Dapper, POCO, Repositories, Crud | ORM, SQL, MySQL, SQLite, PostgreSQL, Dapper, POCO, MsSql, Crud, Localdb |
* Code Quality Rankings and insights are calculated and provided by Lumnify.
They vary from L1 to L5 with "L5" being the highest. Visit our partner's website for more details.
Solutions like Dependabot or Renovate update but don't merge dependencies. You need to do it manually while it could be fully automated! Add a Merge Queue to your workflow and stop caring about PR management & merging. Try Mergify for free.
Interest over time of MicroOrm.Dapper.Repositories and Dapper.FastCRUD
Note: It is possible that some search terms could be used in multiple areas and that could skew some graphs.
More comparisons
-
Dapper.FastCRUDvsDapper Extensions
-
Dapper.FastCRUDvsPetaPoco
-
MicroOrm.Dapper.RepositoriesvsTypeORM
-
Dapper.FastCRUDvsNPoco
-
MicroOrm.Dapper.RepositoriesvsDapper
-
Dapper.FastCRUDvsLINQ to DB
Do not miss the trending .NET projects and news
» Subscribe to our newsletter «
» Subscribe to our newsletter «